Legal Opinion

Deming Inv. Co. v. Baird

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1912No. 1639PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Tulsa County Court; N. J. Gubser, Judge. Action by the Deming Investment Company against Melville R. Baird. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was begun July 16, 1909. The petition of plaintiff contains, in substance, the following allegations:(1) That plaintiff is a corporation created under the laws •of Kansas, and authorized to do business in Oklahoma.(2) That in March, 1909, defendant employed plaintiff to negotiate a loan of $10,000 for him; that the contract of employment was in writing, copy of which is attached to, and made a part of, the petition.(3) That, pursuant to the written contract, plaintiff procured the loan.(4) That one of the conditions of the contract of employment is as follows:

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. WilletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Haier v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Haynes v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. J. I Case Plowworks v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Deming Inv. Co. v. BrittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. C. I. T. Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API