Legal Opinion
Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. Ballard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 1926No. 16735PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, O.
The Kansas Flour Mills Company entered into a contract in writing with C. V. Ballard et al., wherein (he 'latter bound themselves to purchase from the milling company 420 barrels of flour. OneJhalf of the shipment was to. he delivered the 1st of April, and the other on the 1st day of May. The contract provided for a replacement charge, and also for a charge of 50 cents per barrel as cost, either for the sale or resale of the flour, if the contract should be breached by the vendees. The vendees refused to receive the flour, and the milling company sued the vendees for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- J. I Case Plowworks v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Deming Inv. Co. v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Dillon v. RinglemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. File Bros. Wholesale Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Home Bakery v. Robinson Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- J. W. Cherry & Co. v. Consolidated Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.