Legal Opinion

In re Hamil

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1982No. 81-97PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

The Juvenile Court concluded appellant ODMH was secondarily liable for the cost of Jeffrey’s care at Bellefaire. The Court of Appeals modified this order somewhat and imposed primary liability upon ODMH. After reviewing the applicable authority we conclude ODMH’s duty is restricted to maintaining those individuals confined to institutions owned and operated by the state and does not extend to absorbing the cost of care for patients placed in private psychiatric facilities such as Bellefaire. In light of this, we reverse.

The issue presented for our consideration herein is does the Juvenile…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bureau of Support in the Department of Mental Hygiene & Correction v. KreitzerOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re DoeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re HoodletOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. In Re LozanoOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ohio Department of Mental Health v. Clermont County Alcohol, Drug Addiction & Mental Health Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Berger v. Clermont County Alcohol, Drug Addiction & Mental Health Services BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API