Legal Opinion

Ohio Department of Mental Health v. Clermont County Alcohol, Drug Addiction & Mental Health Services Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1994No. 93-1689PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtA. William Sweeney, J.

I

The present controversy concerns the authority of a probate court to issue an order of involuntary commitment for mental health treatment and to require the Ohio Department of Mental Health to assume the cost of such treatment. The jurisdiction of probate courts to conduct commitment hearings is set forth in R.C. 2101.24(A). This section provides in relevant part:

“(2) In addition to the exclusive jurisdiction conferred upon the probate court by division (A)(1) of this section, the probate court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over a particular subject matter if both of the following apply:
“…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re BurtonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In re HamilOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HaysOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API