Dovich v. Chief Consolidated Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. Geo. E. Goodwin, Judge. Action by Mike Dovich against the Chief Consolidated Mining Company. Judgment for nlaintiff. Defendant appeals,
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
Action for personal injury. Plaintiff was injured in defendant ’s mine in Eureka, Juab County, Utah, while engaged in repairing an air pipe line in the main drift on what is known as the 1,400 foot level. Plaintiff was employed as a timberman in said mine, but was also subject to the orders of the shift boss or foreman for any other work that might be necessary in the mine. It is alleged by the defendant that it was also his duty, without special request, to do any other work that might be necessary for the good conduct and safety of the mine when such work appeared to him to be necessary.
On…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BelliwithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Wallace v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Woods v. WikstromOregon Supreme Court · 1913
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- McLaughlin v. Chief Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis v. HeinerUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. Utah Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- Rollison v. MuirSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.