Davis v. Heiner
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District, Utah County; A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by William W. Davis against George A. Heiner. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
Three causes of action are stated in the complaint. During the trial the third cause was dismissed, and that will not be further considered. The only dispute respecting the second cause of action is that defendant pleads payment. The whole controversy is therefore concerned with the first cause of action.
Plaintiff alleges an oral contract between himself and the defendant made on or about the 15th day of January, 1917, by which the plaintiff undertook to purchase certain cattle for the defendant and to hold the same until about the twentieth day of February that year at which time.they were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pulos v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Smith v. Columbus Buggy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
- Dovich v. Chief Consolidated Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Moore v. Utah Idaho Cent. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. NixonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Startin v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Bruner v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Shields v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
- Taylor v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.