Legal Opinion

State v. Cromb

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 2008No. 0401-30254, 0401-30440, A129799 (Control), A130120PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

A police officer walked into the area of a hospital emergency room where defendant was being treated after a car accident. The officer observed defendant’s vital signs and medical staffs diagnosis of his condition and, thereafter, obtained a sample of defendant’s urine for chemical testing. ORS 813.140. 1 A grand jury indicted defendant for, among other offenses, driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. Defendant filed a motion to suppress the test results of the urine sample, asserting that the investigating officer’s warrantless observations in the emergency room that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MacHucaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. United States v. Lamar ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. State of Iowa v. Michael LomaxCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. MichelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API