Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2017No. 11CR1154; A150972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

ORS 676.260(1) imposes a mandatory reporting duty on health care facilities under certain circumstances. A health care facility “shall notify” a law enforcement officer present at the facility investigating a motor vehicle accident if, immediately after the accident, the facility treats “a person reasonably believed to be the operator of a motor vehicle involved in the accident” and, in the course of treatment, tests the person’s blood and discovers that the person’s blood alcohol level exceeds .08 percent or that the blood contains a controlled substance.1

As part of defendant’s treatment for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. FincherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API