State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.
ORS 676.260(1) imposes a mandatory reporting duty on health care facilities under certain circumstances. A health care facility “shall notify” a law enforcement officer present at the facility investigating a motor vehicle accident if, immediately after the accident, the facility treats “a person reasonably believed to be the operator of a motor vehicle involved in the accident” and, in the course of treatment, tests the person’s blood and discovers that the person’s blood alcohol level exceeds .08 percent or that the blood contains a controlled substance.1
As part of defendant’s treatment for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. FincherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022