Legal Opinion

Potter v. Sheets

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1892No. 675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellees sued the appellants, Sarah M. Potter and William H. Potter, and obtained judgment against both the defendants. Sarah M. Potter alone assigns errors.

The action was upon a joint and several promissory note • made by the appellants, December 7th, 1886, payable to the order of one Elizabeth A. Spray, at the First National Bank of Crawfordsville, Indiana, and assigned by the payee to one John Spray, who afterward assigned it, before maturity, to the appellees, each assignment being alleged to have been made for a valuable consideration, by indorsement in writing upon the note.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. West v. LarawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cummings v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Leschen v. GuyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wright v. FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Cook v. BuhrlageIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dickey v. KalfsbeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API