Legal Opinion

Wright v. Fox

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1913No. 8,058PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom Miami Circuit Court; Joseph N. Tillett, Judge. Action by Frederick S. Wright against Barbria E. Pox. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The facts in this case are in part as follows : On and prior to February 1, 1907, George W. Souers was a dealer in stallions at Warren, Indiana. Prior to that day, John M. Fox, husband of appellee, had been negotiating with Souers for the purchase of such a horse. Souers and Fox came to an agreement, by which the latter was to purchase from the former a certain Belgian stallion, known as “Surprenant”, at the price of $1,650, payment to be made by the execution of two notes, bearing date of February 1, 1907, in the respective sums of $500 and $600, maturing September 1, 1908, and September 1,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. McMaster v. . Pres., Etc., Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Strong v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Hubbard v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Safford v. GroutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HowarthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Pabst Brewing Co. v. SchusterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Fox Realty Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Taylor v. GrinerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Fuqua v. Merchants Loan & Savings Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API