Legal Opinion

Cook v. Buhrlage

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902No. 19,873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Marion Superior Court; Vinson Garter, Judge. Action by Louisa C. E. Cook against Minnie L. Buhrlage and Wilhelmina Theine upon promissory notes. From a judgment in favor of defendant Wilhelmina Theine, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— Appellant brought this action upon several promissory notes executed by appellees for real estate conveyed to appellee Buhrlage. The complaint does not disclose the fact that appellee Wilhelmina Theine was, when she executed said notes, a married woman. It became a question, under the issues, whether or not appellee Theine was a principal or surety on said«notes. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of appellant against appellees, and answered interrogatories submitted by the court. Over appellant’s motion for a new trial the court rendered judgment on the general verdict against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brown v. WillIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Arnold v. EnglemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. CollierIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Harbaugh v. TannerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Davis v. NeighborsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Guy v. LiberenzIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Aldridge v. ClasmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API