Legal Opinion

R. P. Oldham Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 27, 1952No. 56507; protest 161575-K (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is an action to recover excess duties alleged to have been erroneously assessed against an importation of cotton fish netting. The collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles, Calif., classified the importation as manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 923 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Plaintiff claims, however, that the involved merchandise is properly dutiable at only 30 per centum ad valorem, as “fishing nets valued at 50 cents or more per pound” by virtue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. United States v. BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Florida Fishermens Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  5. W. A. Augur, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R. P. Oldham Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API