Legal Opinion

R. P. Oldham Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 3, 1953No. 4738Published

1Opinion of the CourtCole, Judge

The subject importation of this appeal consists of merchandise invoiced as “Cotton Pish Netting,” described in the entry as “4 bales *54cotton fishing nets;” classified by the collector as a manufacture of cotton, not specially provided for, at 40 per cent ad valorem, and claimed in appellant-importer’s protest to be properly dutiable under the same paragraph as fishing nets at 30 per cent ad valorem.

The involved statute reads as follows:

Tariff Aet of 1930:

Par. 923. All manufactures, wholly or in chief value of cotton, not specially provided for, 40 per centum ad valorem.

Paragraph 923, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Fishermens Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. W. A. Augur, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. R. P. Oldham Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API