Legal Opinion

Florida Fishermens Supply Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 15, 1949No. 53713; protest 144602-K (Tampa)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is a suit to recover duties alleged to have been erroneously assessed upon certain merchandise, imported through the port of Tampa, Fla. The merchandise, described on the consular invoice as fishing nets, was assessed with duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to paragraph 923 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as manufactures in chief value of cotton, not specially provided for. It was claimed in the protest that the merchandise is properly dutiable at only 30 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of said paragraph 923, as modified by the General Agreement on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. W. A. Augur, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kwan Yuen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. R. P. Oldham Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. E. D. Jones & Sons, Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Pier I Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. R. P. Oldham Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API