Legal Opinion
C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. Boatwright
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 14, 1932PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
For convenience the parties will be referred to in the position occupied by them in the court below. A. P. Heymond, defendant, acting for himself and for Luck and Sons, Inc., entered into a contract on May 31, 1928, with the State Road Commission of Maryland for the construction of a section of highway in that State and, as he was required to do, executed his bond with United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, as surety, conditioned for its faithful performance. On June 14, 1928, he sublet to Daniel, Knighton and Company all grading, clearing and grubbing on that project. *493Shortly…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mankin v. United States Ex Rel. Ludowici-Celadon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bentley Funding v. Sk & R GroupSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Conesco Industries, Ltd. A New Jersey Corporation v. Conforti and Eisele, Inc., D. C. A District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Southwood Builders, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Board of Supervisors v. Southern Cross Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- American National Bank & Trust Co. v. KushnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.