Legal Opinion
Conesco Industries, Ltd. A New Jersey Corporation v. Conforti and Eisele, Inc., D. C. A District of Columbia Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 17, 1980No. 78-1588PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES F. GORDON, District Judge:1
This case involves an action brought by the appellant, Conesco Industries, Ltd., (hereinafter Conesco) for compensation for the use of concrete forming materials used in the construction of the Gallerie Mall shopping center. The appellee, Conforti & Eisele, Inc., D.C., (hereinafter C & E) was the general contractor of this project, and appellee Maryland Casualty Company (hereinafter Maryland) was the bonding company that executed the surety bond for the construction project. At the district court level, C & E was dismissed as a party as a result of Conesco’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Watkins v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Lange v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Geico v. Valentine FetisoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Edward William Hull, A/K/A Edward Hull v. Eaton Corporation Edward William Hull Travelers Insurance Company v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Oscar S. Gray v. American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Potomac Plaza Terraces, Inc. v. QSC Products, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.