Legal Opinion
State v. Sandoval
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 2007No. 25,841, 25,842PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} This consolidated appeal challenges Defendant’s convictions in two separate cases of forgery. Both cases involve similar facts: Defendant provided false names and social security numbers on forms used to secure employment with two different employers. On appeal, Defendant raises a number of challenges to the forgery convictions as a matter of law, as well as issues concerning lesser included offenses and suppression of evidence. We hold that Defendant’s actions did not constitute forgery as a matter of law, and we reverse.
BACKGROUND
{2} Defendant was born in Peru and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- United States v. Arminta Mohundro RussellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ReynuaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. ScottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008