Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2008No. 26,883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This is another case raising the issue of whether a particular document purports to have legal efficacy so that it can be made the foundation of a forgery conviction. At issue in this case are a doctor’s note and an order for diagnostic testing that were used to create an excuse for Defendant’s non-appearance at a certain court-ordered appointment. We hold that such documents have mere evidentiary value, as opposed to legal efficacy, and therefore our recent case of State v. Cearley, 2004-NMCA-079, 135 N.M. 710, 92 P.3d 1284 mandates a reversal.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

{2}…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McCraryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cobb v. State Canvassing BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. NguyenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. CarbajalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. VanceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State of Iowa v. Randy Allen CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  5. State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API