State v. Scott
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} This is another case raising the issue of whether a particular document purports to have legal efficacy so that it can be made the foundation of a forgery conviction. At issue in this case are a doctor’s note and an order for diagnostic testing that were used to create an excuse for Defendant’s non-appearance at a certain court-ordered appointment. We hold that such documents have mere evidentiary value, as opposed to legal efficacy, and therefore our recent case of State v. Cearley, 2004-NMCA-079, 135 N.M. 710, 92 P.3d 1284 mandates a reversal.
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
{2}…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. McCraryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Cobb v. State Canvassing BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. NguyenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. CarbajalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. VanceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State of Iowa v. Randy Allen CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024