Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. George

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 After a bench trial, appellant Kevin George was found guilty of violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4116(d) (related to trafficking in unauthorized copies of recorded devices) and 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4119 (related to trafficking in items bearing counterfeit marks).

—Suppression—

¶ 2 Appellant first argues that the trial court erred in not suppressing the videotapes recovered from a sales table appellant had set up on a public street. Appellant claims that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him; therefore the evidence they seized pursuant to the illegal arrest must be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LuvSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. StokesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. StevensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. JohonosonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Com. v. Jones-Williams, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Jones-Williams, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Com. v. Bendik, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API