Commonwealth v. Luv
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
Following a bench trial, appellant Daryl Luv was convicted of possession of cocaine and possession with intent to deliver.1 He was sentenced to five to ten years incarceration and fined thirty thousand dollars. The superior court affirmed without dissent. We granted allocatur to determine whether probable existed to stop and search Luv’s vehicle without a warrant.
In the course of an ongoing investigation, the Wilkes-Barre police department requested and obtained a search warrant *574for appellant’s residence. Probable cause for the warrant was based…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. DiStefanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. HenniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.