Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stokes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1978No. 399 and 430PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Chief Justice.

These appeals1 were entered by the Commonwealth2 from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia granting defendant David Stokes’ motion to suppress certain incriminatory statements given to the police following his arrest. The court below ordered suppression of Stokes’ statements on the basis that this evidence was the product of an illegal arrest. We agree and, accordingly, affirm the order.

The charges against Stokes arose out of the robbery and fatal shooting of John J. Meehan at 1133 N. 63rd Street, Philadelphia, on July 1, 1976.

On…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. ZookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API