Legal Opinion
People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 2017No. H042287PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
—Defendant Daniel Smith pleaded no contest to attempted possession of a controlled substance for sale (Pen. Code, § 664; Health & Saf. Code, § 11378). The trial court placed him on probation for three years with numerous conditions and ordered him to register as a narcotics offender under Health and Safety Code section 11590. Defendant contends that section 11590 does not permit a court to require narcotics offender registration where the conviction was for an attempted, rather than completed, violation of section 11378. He also challenges as unreasonable, vague, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Guzman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. CHR Herbal RemediesCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
- In re M.J. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.