Legal Opinion
People v. CHR Herbal Remedies
California Superior Court
Decided May 30, 2017No. BR 053028PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRicciardulli, J.
*29INTRODUCTION
Defendants CHR Herbal Remedies, aka California Herbal Remedies, Inc., and Orlando *2Yepes appeal the judgment after they were found guilty of four counts of operating an unlawful medical marijuana business (MMB) (L.A. Mun. Code (LAMC), § 45.19.6.2, subd. A). Defendants contend the judgment should be reversed because they substantially complied with the requirements needed to obtain limited immunity from prosecution, despite the fact their MMB was located within 1,000 feet of a high school and within 600 feet of a child care facility (see LAMC, § 45.19.6.3, subd. O). As discussed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lyles v. Sangadeo-PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Trinity Holistic Caregivers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Toluca Lake CollectiveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Toluca Lake Collective, Inc.California Superior Court · 2017