People v. Guzman
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, J.*
*56Benito Guzman appeals from an order modifying the conditions of his supervised probation to explicitly authorize warrantless searches of his electronic devices. Guzman contends (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order the modification because no new circumstances existed and (2) the electronic search probation condition violates Guzman's constitutional right to privacy. We affirm the order.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Guzman's 2015 Offense and Sentence
In April 2015, Guzman was charged with two felonies: (count 1) arranging a meeting with a minor for the purpose of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. CooksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. EbertowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Dodson CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Salcido, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Wright, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019