Legal Opinion

In Re Initiative Petition No. 341, State Question No. 627

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1990No. 74409PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

This protest challenges Initiative Petition No. 341, State Question No. 627 (Petition). Protestants, in their brief, make three objections: (1) The Petition is invalid on its face for the reason that it violates the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States; (2) The Petition is invalid on its face for the reason that it violates article IV, section 1, of the Oklahoma Constitution; and (3) The ballot title of State Question Number 627 does not comply with Okla.Stat. title 34, § 9 (Supp.1983). In the Amended Application, they also raise the issue of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. In Re Initiative Petition No. 360Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API