Legal Opinion
In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 4, 1992No. 76437PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
Although this proceeding, filed in reference to Initiative Petition No. 349 (petition/abortion petition), initially presented multiple issues, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, — U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 2815, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992) has rendered a single issue dispositive — whether Initiative Petition No. 349 is constitutional. We find: 1) that the issue of the constitutionality of the initiative petition is governed by the United States Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Casey; and that we are bound to follow the mandate of the United…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Committee to Recall Menendez v. WellsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 360Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.