Legal Opinion
Darter v. Magnussen
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 10, 1959No. Civ. 18153, 18195PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Two consolidated appeals by defendant in a divorce action. One (No. 18153) is from an order denying defendant’s motion for modification of the interlocutory decree. The other (No. 18195) is from an order appointing a receiver to sell real property as provided in that decree.
Questions Presented
1. Did the court have power by reason of Anna’s death to modify the community property award to her in the interlocutory decree?
2. Did the court abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver ?
3. Did the court err in refusing to strike from the interlocutory decree the award to plaintiff of attorney’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Fritschi v. TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harley v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- In Re Marriage of ShaymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.