Legal Opinion
Fritschi v. Teed
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1963No. Civ. 10384PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
The present litigation represents one phase of the same hostilities which produced our decision in Estate of Fritschi, * (Cal.App.) 28 Cal.Rptr. 86. Plaintiff Rose Marie Fritschi and Dr. Fritschi had married in 1934 and received an interlocutory decree of divorce in April 1958. At the time of their divorce they were the parents of two teen-age sons. For several years preceding the divorce Dr. Fritschi had been engaged in an affair with defendant Marie Teed. The Fritschi divorce proceedings were contested. They culminated in an interlocutory decree signed and entered on April 23, 1958. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Todd v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Golden v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kimes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- In Re Marriage of FortierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.