Legal Opinion
Skf USA Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 26, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-116; Court 05-00542PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
I. Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) (2000).
II. Standard of Review
As set out in the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) 1 this Court “will set aside Customs’ denial of offset distribution only if it is ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.’ ” Dixon Ticonderoga Co. v. United States, 468 F.3d 1353, 1354 (Fed.Cir.2006)(quoting Candle Corp. of America v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 374 F.3d 1087, 1091 (Fed.Cir.2004)(citing 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2000))).
III. Background
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Dixon Ticonderoga Company v. United States, and Musgrave Pencil Company, Rosemoon Pencil Company and General Pencil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009