Legal Opinion
Skf USA Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 12, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-139; Court 05-00542PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, SKF USA Inc. (“SKF”), moves pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1 for summary judgment on the agency record challenging Defendants, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs’ ”) and the International Trade Commission’s (“ITC’s”) (collectively, the “Government’s”) determination that SKF is not an “affected domestic producer” under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) and thus not eligible to receive CDSOA distributions. SKF specifically challenges the constitutionality of the CDSOA on First Amendment, Due Process and Equal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- New Hampshire Ball Bearing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United States International Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ethan Allen Global, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.