Dickerson v. Tinling
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. This was a suit by Edward N. Dickerson against Hugh D. Tinting for alleged infringement of a patent. The court below denied a motion for preliminary injunction, and the plaintiff thereupon appealed to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendant from infringing letters patent No. 400,086, issued March 26,1889, to the Farbenfabriken, Yormals Friedr. Bayer & Co., a corporation of Germany, hereafter called Bayer & Co., as assignee of Oskar Hins-berg. The letters patent secure to Bayer & Co. the monopoly of the manufacture and sale of phenacetine or paracet-phenetidine in the United States. The appellant, Edward N. Dickerson, alleged in his bill that these letters patent had been issued and assigned to him, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Boesch v. GraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hobbie v. JennisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dickerson v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- General Electric Co. v. Continental Lamp Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. v. Jazz Photo Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Curtiss Aeroplane & Motor Corp. v. United Aircraft Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.