Legal Opinion

Boesch v. Graff

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1890No. 1408PublishedCited by 87 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

delivered the. opinion of the court.

Albert Graff and J. F. Donnell filed their bill in the Circuit Court of the United States- for the Northern District of California against Emile Boesch and Martin Bauer, to recover for infringement of -letters patent No. 289,571, for an improvement in lamp burners,, granted on December '4, 1883, to Carl Schwintzer and Wilhelm. Graff of. Berlin, Germany, assignors of one-half to J. F. Donnell & Co., of New York,’all rights being averred to be now vested in the complainants. Claim 1 alleged to have been infringed reads as follows:

“ In a lamp burner of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  5. A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API