Legal Opinion

Steinhilper v. . Basnight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from W. B. Allen, J., at tbe May Term, 1910, of CUMBERLAND. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to recover the amount of three notes, made by the defendant to H. W. Steinhilper and alleged to have been sold by him to the plaintiff, who is his wife. The defendant averred that two of the notes, each for $500 and dated 26 June, 1898, were executed by mistake, having been given for lumber for which he had already paid, and the jury so found by their verdict. As to the other note, he alleged that it was given for the purchase price of timber, and that H. W. Steinhilper represented, at the time of the purchase, that the encumbrances thereon amounted to only $150, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayers v. McRimmon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Tyson v. Joyner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Bank v. . YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Long v. ShaferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Foxman v. . HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Lumber Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API