Legal Opinion

In re Mapakarakes

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pécora, J.

This is one of a series of five motions made to compel the property clerk of the police department of the city of New York to turn over certain apparatus commonly known as pin ball or bagatelle game machines. The facts in all the motions are substantially the same.

Petitioner was arrested and charged with a violation of section 982 of the Penal Law. Upon a hearing in the Magistrates’ Court, the arresting officer testified that he had gone to the petitioner’s place of business and there played a pin ball or bagatelle game. Further, that he had agreed with petitioner that if a certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Times Amusement Corp. v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. MillsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  3. Times Amusement Corp. v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Kearney v. City of ElmiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. MihalowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. People v. WhitcombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. State v. PaulNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. People v. RiveroNew York Court of Special Session · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API