Legal Opinion

Times Amusement Corp. v. Moss

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.

The plaintiff is engaged in the business of conducting an amusement center. It there operates a number of machines, commonly known as pin ball or bagatelle games. These machines have each been separately licensed by the defendant, the commissioner of licenses of the city of New York, since October 3, 1932. Such licenses run from November first of each year to October thirty-first of the following year, and have been renewed annually. The present licenses will expire October 31, 1936. The defendant is now threatening to revoke them on the ground that the machines are illegal slot machines…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Shapiro v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Green v. One 5¢ Fifth Inning Base Ball MacHineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Pepple v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. MihalowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. In re MapakarakesNew York Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API