People v. Rivero
New York Court of Special Session
1Opinion of the Court
Canudo, M.
Motions by the defendant are denied and she is found guilty in accordance with opinion below.
*1051The arresting officer testified that on two successive days he visited a restaurant at 430 Flushing Avenue, county of Kings, owned and operated by the defendant Rose Rivero. He states that on the second day he played a machine called Heneo Advance Roll fifteen times by inserting a five-cent coin each time; that there were no signs on the machine indicating a winning score, free play or prize; that while he played the machine he conversed in English with the defendant and with a young man now…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Times Amusement Corp. v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. CohenNew York Magistrate Court · 1936
- Hitchins v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- In re MapakarakesNew York Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- S. & F. Corp. v. WasmerNew York Supreme Court · 1949