Legal Opinion

People v. Rivero

New York Court of Special Session

Decided November 28, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Canudo, M.

Motions by the defendant are denied and she is found guilty in accordance with opinion below.

*1051The arresting officer testified that on two successive days he visited a restaurant at 430 Flushing Avenue, county of Kings, owned and operated by the defendant Rose Rivero. He states that on the second day he played a machine called Heneo Advance Roll fifteen times by inserting a five-cent coin each time; that there were no signs on the machine indicating a winning score, free play or prize; that while he played the machine he conversed in English with the defendant and with a young man now…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Times Amusement Corp. v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. People v. CohenNew York Magistrate Court · 1936
  4. Hitchins v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. In re MapakarakesNew York Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. S. & F. Corp. v. WasmerNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API