Legal Opinion

People v. Whitcomb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKimball, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Whitcomb and the intervener, Greene, from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County, which affirmed an order of the City Court of Buffalo, directing the summary destruction of a pinball machine, pursuant to the provisions of section 985 of the Penal Law. The machine was on the premises of Whitcomb. It appears that the intervener was the owner of it. Before this appeal was heard, the District Attorney moved this court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it does not lie as a matter of right. The decision on this motion was held pending the appeal from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Phelps v. . RaceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. International Mutoscope Reel Co., Inc. v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burke v. Kingsley Books, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Prendergast v. DwyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. WakeleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. People v. WhitcombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API