Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1986No. C0-84-2128Published

1Opinion of the Court

380 N.W.2d 766 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Marshall Donald MURPHY, Appellant.

No. C0-84-2128.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 31, 1986.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Brian I. Rademacher, Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas J. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Section, Paul R. Jennings, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

On September 14, 1984, defendant Marshall Donald Murphy was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API