Legal Opinion
Helena Rubinstein, Inc. v. Charline's Cut Rate
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided September 11, 1942No. Docket 139/442PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The original bill of complaint filed in this matter on December 26th, 1941, sets forth alleged violations by the defendants ofN.J.R.S. 56:4-3 et seq., commonly called the "Fair Trade Act." An order to show cause having issued why injunctive relief should not be granted, the defendants filed opposing affidavits and the application for a preliminary injunction was denied January 26th, 1942.
Complainant filed an amended bill of complaint on May 6th, 1942, alleging that the violations of its minimum resale prices by the defendants had continued from November, 1941, continuously to May, 1942.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Long Branch Banking Co. v. HowlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Bowles v. StapletonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1943