Legal Opinion
Spadaro v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 6, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The plaintiff conducted a restaurant in Greenwich, Connecticut, wherein liquor was sold under a restaurant permit issued to him by the liquor control commission, the defendant, under the provisions of General Statutes §§30-15 (e) (1) and 30-22 (1). On September 30,1960, the commission, after a hearing, revoked the permit on the ground that the plaintiff, by himself, his servant or his agent, allowed “gambling (pool playing, horse betting)” in the restaurant in violation of the regulations of the commission. Conn. Dept. Regs. § 204-10. The plaintiff appealed from the order of revocation to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Guerriero v. GalassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sumara v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Viola v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Balog v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Slimp v. State, Dept. of Liquor Control, No. Cv 95-705810 (Nov. 30, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Spadaro v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962