Legal Opinion

Viola v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 1, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

The defendant liquor control commission, after hearing, denied the plaintiff’s application for a cafe permit at 84 Union Place in Hartford. The commission acted under authority of § 30-46 of the General Statutes, the material portion of which provides that “[t]he commission may, except as to a store engaged chiefly in the sale of groceries, refuse to grant permits for the sale of alcoholic liquor if it has reasonable cause to believe: ... (3) that the number of permit premises in the locality is such that the granting of a permit is detrimental to public interest, and, in reaching a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biz v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Ruppert v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Spadaro v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Balog v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Gulia v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Crescimanni v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API