Viola v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendant liquor control commission, after hearing, denied the plaintiff’s application for a cafe permit at 84 Union Place in Hartford. The commission acted under authority of § 30-46 of the General Statutes, the material portion of which provides that “[t]he commission may, except as to a store engaged chiefly in the sale of groceries, refuse to grant permits for the sale of alcoholic liquor if it has reasonable cause to believe: ... (3) that the number of permit premises in the locality is such that the granting of a permit is detrimental to public interest, and, in reaching a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Biz v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Ruppert v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Spadaro v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Balog v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Gulia v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Crescimanni v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972