Legal Opinion

Backus v. Kirsch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 37,077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On December 5. 1928, Henry N. Backus and Ada T. Backus filed separate bills to rescind, for fraud, their sale, in July; 1928, of certain shares of stock in Kirsch Manufacturing Company to Charles W. Kirsch, who was the president, majority stockholder, and dominant personage in the corporation. In May, 1929, such plaintiffs first learned that on or about the years 1921 and 1922, and while plaintiffs owned the shares, Mr. Kirsch had wrongfully appropriated to himself large blocks of stock in the company and sums of money, and which wrongful acts depreciated the value of plaintiffs’ shares.

Plaint…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. Hathaway v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Barnhardt v. HamelMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Garber v. TownMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Mitchell v. BeachySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clarence v. Watson v. Woodrow C. ButtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Mair v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Brachman v. HymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Mair v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API