Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Hudson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 155, Calendar No. 36,021PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a bill for cancellation of a land contract. Plaintiffs had decree in the circuit, and defendants have appealed.

Prior to February 10, 1920, Alex C. Krentel and George Krentel, Jr., were the owners in fee of the land hereinafter described. On that date they entered into a contract to sell the parcel to the defendant Ralph S. Hudson. On the 15th day of May, 1922, Ralph S. Hudson and wife, two of the defendants herein, entered into a contract with the plaintiffs to sell to them the same parcel of land, describing it as a lot in East Lansing, Michigan, and bounded by a line commencing on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan Insurance v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Lewis v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Knudsen v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Johnson v. QFD, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API