Legal Opinion

Brachman v. Hyman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1941No. Docket No. 7, Calendar No. 41,332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bushnell, J:

This is an appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff Herman J. Brachman, on October 27, 1925, was the holder of 999 shares of capital stock of defendant Farmer-Monroe Realty Company, and plaintiff Morris Brachman later became the holder of one share of stock of this company. Defendant Harry A. Hyman was the holder of 999 shares of the stock and was president of the company. Defendant Martha Hyman was the holder of one share. On the above date the realty company became the lessee of certain premises in the city of Detroit, described as:

“A four-story and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Grigg v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Witherbee v. . BowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Empire Realty Co. v. HartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Wilkin v. KeithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Stewart v. Michigan Bell Telephone CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Environair, Inc v. Steelcase, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Second National Bank & Trust Co. v. ReidMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API