Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 7, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 22, 2006, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, a manager in the employer’s frame shop, testified that she quit her job because the employer reduced her work hours and would no longer provide her with a paid lunch break…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim UblAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of BattisteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of FlorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Matter of Rial (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API