Legal Opinion

Samosky v. United Parcel Service

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided May 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 1:10-01081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID A. FABER, Senior District Judge.

By Judgment Order entered on March 29, 2013, the court GRANTED the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No. 175 (“Local Union No. 175” or “Local 175”), GRANTED the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (“IBT” or “International Union”), and GRANTED the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants United Parcel Service, Sharpe, and Schau (collectively “the UPS defendants”). (Doc. # 97). The reasons for that decision…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013
  2. Carrington v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Jeffery v. ERP Federal Mining Complex LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2022
  4. Lay v. Local Union 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API