Legal Opinion
Lay v. Local Union 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 1, 2019No. 8:18-cv-02183Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EMANUEL LAY, SR. * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil No. PJM 18-2183 * LOCAL UNION 689 OF THE * AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, * AFL-CIO * * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Emanuel Lay, Sr. (“Lay”) filed this action on July 16, 2018 against his former employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) and his union, Local Union 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO (“Local 689”), alleging breach of a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) and breach of the union’s duty of fair representation. Both WMATA and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.