Legal Opinion

Hogans v. Demps

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit' Court for Suwannee County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

— Hogans brought ejectment against Demps. A former judgment for the plaintiff was reversed because a present right of possession in the plaintiff was not shown. Demps v. Hogan, 57 Fla. 60, 48 South. Rep. 998. A second trial was before a referee and resulted in a judgment for defendant, to which plaintiff took writ of error. The transcript does not purport to contain all the evidence adduced at the trial, therefore the grounds of the motion for new trial’ that the finding is contrary to the evidence cannot be considered here. There is nothing to indicate that the finding and judgment are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Demps v. HoganSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Falk v. KimmerleSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. Goodwin v. MarkwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API