Legal Opinion
Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1959No. 18105_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Florence Lus-tig Crossman, operates women’s dress •shops in Miami Beach, Palm Beach, and Bal Harbour, Florida, in New York City, .and in other places. The defendant-•appellee is the Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation of Miami, Florida. The Fon-tainebleau Hotel opened for business in December 1954.
Lustig filed suit for a declaratory .judgment against Fontainebleau October 19, 1959, in the Southern District of Florida asserting that she was the as-signee of a lessee’s interest in a lease for shop space in the hotel, and that the lease had a renewal…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Southern California Petroleum Corporation, Mohawk Petroleum Corporation and Kewanee Oil Company v. George W. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Jacksonville Blow Pipe Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Miller v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Maloy v. BoyettSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Chamberlain v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1897
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- A&M Gerber Chiropractic LLC v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Mathews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.