Legal Opinion
Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1959No. 18105_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
273 F.2d 720
Florence Lustig CROSSMAN, a/k/a Florence Lustig, Trading and doing business as Florence Lustig, Appellant,
v.
FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., Appellee.
No. 18105.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
December 18, 1959.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Richard P. Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
1
The plaintiff-appellant, Florence Lustig Crossman, operates women's dress shops in Miami Beach, Palm Beach, and Bal Harbour, Florida, in New York City, and in other…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Southern California Petroleum Corporation, Mohawk Petroleum Corporation and Kewanee Oil Company v. George W. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Jacksonville Blow Pipe Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Miller v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Maloy v. BoyettSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.